 |
Biocontrol in tea
Tea
plants are subject to attack by a large number of insect pests and fungal
diseases, also by bacteria, algae and viruses. Infections can be exacerbated
by the pruning and plucking regimes practised in plantation monocultures.
While these restrict growth to form a short, vegetative bush form, and
make harvesting easier and yield higher, this method of management also
facilitates transmission of pathogens and reduces the success of control
attempts. Losses can be particularly high in countries like Sri Lanka
where tea estates are situated close together.
Chemical pesticides have proved effective in the past, but greater consumer
health-consciousness is driving demand for teas completely free of, or
only minimally contaminated with, chemicals. This has led to increased
research into biocontrol methods, which also offer benefits of greater
biodiversity and cost savings to growers.
Biocontrol using fungus
Natural methods of controlling fungi and insects are being tested in
India and Sri Lanka with increasing success. Worldwide, there are 380
fungal pathogens which attack tea. In Sri Lanka, scientists are focussing
on antagonistic fungi and bacteria that parasitize pathogenic fungi and
destroy the pathogen in one of several ways. According to Abhaya Balasuriya,
a scientist at the Tea Research Institute (TRI) in Talawakelle, Sri Lanka,
the first step in biocontrol using fungi involves searching for strains
with potential for antagonism from areas where diseases are prevalent.
"Isolates showing some promise are made into pure cultures before they
are used for in vitro tests," he says. He notes that Trichoderma
harzianum is a widely studied antagonist because it has the ability
to out-compete pathogenic fungi, and to parasitize them by producing toxic
compounds or enzymes that destroy pathogenic cells.
 |
|
credit: Indian Institute of Horticultural Research
|
In the lab, Balasuriya and his colleagues have found some fungal biocontrol
agents that perform comparably with chemical fungicides: T. harzianum
was able to suppress the vegetative growth of black root disease by 85
per cent, compared to fungicides Pyraclostrobin and Propiconazole, both
of which achieved 100 per cent control. When tested against red root disease
and horse hair blight, Trichoderma harzianum Rifai showed better
control than the systemic fungicide, Bitertanol. And in a field trial
of horse hair blight control, Balasuriya found that a treatment containing
T. harzianum was capable of bringing comparable control (about
50 per cent) to that of hydrated liming or the fungicide Propiconazole.
Bacterial biocontrol of fungal pathogens is also proving effective and
may be more successful than fungi in some cases because bacteria grow
rapidly, are easier to handle and are able to survive under adverse conditions.
At the Tea Research Foundation in Valparai, India, scientists studying
grey blight have isolated two indigenous bacterial strains that produce
lytic enzymes which can break down the cell wall of the fungal pathogen,
effectively suppressing spore germination.
Insect biocontrol
There are some 150 insect pests of tea, the most harmful being spider
mites, live-wood termites, parasitic nematodes and shot-hole borer beetles.
At the TRI, a broad research approach has been used to locate the 'weak'
points in the life cycle of pests and their ability to infest the crop.
Among techniques used are host-plant resistance breeding, methods of horticultural
control, and biologically active insecticides such as hormone-mimics and
chitin-synthesis inhibitors. Scientists are also using computer models
to predict insect and mite outbreaks, which helps farmers to limit the
use of chemical pesticides to these events.
While most biocontrol agents are native to the country of origin, Balasuriya
notes that in Sri Lanka "there is a classic example of a parasitoid wasp
(Macrosentus homonae), imported from Java in 1936 for the control
of Homona coffearia (a leaf-eating caterpillar also known as the
tea tortrix), which is still working." The TRI states that, "This success
is regarded in scientific literature as the most outstanding example of
classical biological control ever achieved in the world on a perennial
crop."
Natural pesticides
Pesticides derived from natural substances are less harsh and can at
least partly replace synthetic pesticides. TRI scientists have discovered
non-chemical alternatives to methyl bromide, an ozone-depleting substance
being phased out across the world, which was used to eradicate nematode
species that attack tea plants. Substituting nematode-infested soil with
agricultural wastes, which have pesticidal properties (such as refuse
tea, coir dust and paddy husk), reduces numbers of nematodes, as does
drying nursery soil in the sun and planting nematicidal plants like wild
sunflower. Meanwhile, in India, the Hindustan Lever company, using a bio-pesticide
mixture made from sulphur and an extract of the montanova plant, has reduced
total pesticide use on their plantations by 16 per cent from 2001 to 2003.
Article written by Treena Hein
|