 |
Participation
in practice: Case studies from The Gambia
By David Brown, Mick Howes, Karim Hussein, Catherine Longley and Ken
Swindell
Published by Overseas Development Institute, 111 Westminster Bridge Road,
London, SE1 7JD, UK
Email: odi@odi.org.uk
Website: www.odi.org.uk
2002, 269pp, ISBN 0 85003 598 8(Pb), £19.95
Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) has become the mantra of development
workers in recent years but its effectiveness has been more often asserted
than actually demonstrated. For this reason, the UK Government's Department
for International Development (DFID) asked the Overseas Development Institute
to undertake an analysis of the use of PRA in The Gambia to assess how
effective it was proving to be and what lessons could be learnt. Four
case studies were chosen, one of which involved DFID's principal partner
in The Gambia, ActionAid. Perhaps a little surprisingly, PRA methods were
used despite the obvious risk in using a method as both the subject and
the means of research. The decision was justified on the grounds that
it would help to assess their effectiveness in the programmes under study
and secondly that their use would provide an opportunity for capacity
building in the technique.
Each case study is examined in some detail and these are followed by
a clearly written synthesis of findings. In essence, the conclusion is
that PRA is most unlikely to contribute to a change in development practice
in The Gambia such that village communities will, unprompted by funding
agencies, choose PRA for development planning or resource mobilisation.
Written for development practitioners, this is not an easy book to read.
Some may find it helpful to keep a marker in the page which spells out
acronyms.
Back to top
Negotiating
access to land in West Africa
By Philippe Lavigne Delville, Camilla Toulmin, Jean-Philippe Colin &
Jean-Pierre Chauveau
Published by IIED
Email: orders@earthprint.co.uk
Website: www.earthprint.com
2002, 128pp, ISBN 1 899825 95 9(Pb), $28
The debate about land tenure reform is usually focused upon questions
of title and ownership confirmed by land registry and certification. In
contrast, 'customary' rights have, until comparatively recently, been
merely tolerated by the legislature where there is no conflict with formal
legislation. Locally accepted arrangements for land use in exchange for
cash, labour, sharecropping etc., whether written down or not, are now
receiving greater legal recognition. Since they allow land to be farmed
by someone other than the landowner, and indeed, in some areas this represents
a considerable proportion of all cultivated land, such 'derived' rights
have a significant impact. They also allow agricultural production systems
to adapt to economic changes and are the principal means of access to
land in areas that receive many migrants. Policy makers therefore need
a good understanding of the strength and weaknesses of such systems and
how best to accommodate 'derived' rights to land within more formal arrangements.
Based on the findings of research in six W. African countries; Benin,
Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria and Senegal, the book provides
some fascinating insights into what are, frequently, very complicated
and location specific agreements in which ambiguity appears to be the
defining characteristic. Despite this, the authors are able to draw out
lessons that may help to make derived rights more secure and conflict
resolution more manageable.
Back to top
Innovation in natural resource management
Edited by Ruth Meinzen-Dick, Anna Knox, Frank Place and Brent Swallow
Published for IFPRI by The John Hopkins University Press
Website: www.jhupbooks.com
2002, 317pp, ISBN 0 8018 7143 3(Pb), £22
This book, published in November 2002, originated from a workshop held
five years earlier at ICARDA in Syria to discuss property rights, collective
action and natural resource management. (See Points of View). The principal
area of interest has been to better understand what influences people
to organize themselves and work together to achieve common objectives
and make decisions, individually or collectively, on whether or not to
adopt new agricultural and natural resource management technologies. Without
such understanding, many millions of dollars can be spent on agricultural
research and development to little purpose. Although many factors may
constrain a farmer's choice of technology, lack of secure property rights
is a common and important one. For activities, such as natural resource
management, which require farmers to make joint decisions and cooperate
in implementing them, inadequate institutions for managing collective
activity can also be a constraint.
In contrast to the book above, which concentrates upon land tenure in
W. Africa, the property rights discussed here are taken from case studies
in E. Africa, Latin America and Asia. They are of interest principally
because of the effect they have in terms of the incentives they offer
for individual or collective action. Of interest principally to researchers,
some chapters of the book, for example the account from CIAT of attempts
to encourage collective control of leaf cutting ants in a rural area of
Colombia, make interesting reading for a non-specialist. Other chapters
are more difficult. For example, that on the spatial differences in people's
use of pour-on chemicals to control tsetse in the Ghibe Valley of Ethiopia,
carries equations that require a good number of Greek letters and several
sets of brackets. Something to excite the specialist, no doubt.
Back to top
Land tenure
and rural development in Burkina Faso
By Moussa Ouédraogo
Published by IIED Drylands Programme as Issue paper no. 112
Email: drylands@iied.org
Website: Issues papers can be downloaded for free from www.iied.org/drylands
Hard copies can be bought for US$5 plus P&P from www.Earthprint.com
2002, 24pp, ISSN 1357 9312(Pb), $5
This is an analysis of the challenges facing Burkina Faso as it attempts
to improve natural resources management. The country has experienced endemic
drought since the '70s, serious loss of cultivable land due to desertification,
increasing population pressure and a breakdown in the old patterns of
community ownership of land. The government has introduced a decentralized
sustainable development policy and this short booklet examines its strengths
and weaknesses.
Back to top
|