![]() |
|||||
|
Hot from Johannesburg, this edition of New Agriculturist comes to you as weary delegates head home, hoping that their efforts will not have been in vain. It is too early to say whether there will be any long term political change but, for a few days at least, the publicity accompanying the event itself has meant that people otherwise blind or impervious to faraway worlds have been forced to acknowledge the gross global inequality that exists not least in agricultural production and trade. And many issues demand action if agriculture is to contribute to development, whether that be sustainable or not. Confronting the politically influential, both North and South, with the extent and degree of poverty that afflicts so many, and demonstrating that efforts must be made to lessen this affront to humanity, the Summit may have helped to crack the complacency of the comfortable and force some impetus for change. Our report, 'Back from the Summit', written from Johannesburg as the Summit closed, can be found in Developments. Transnational corporations were, as is usual at such events, criticized for their power over global business generally and agriculture in particular. We reflect some of the concerns expressed by the agrochemicals sector, and their critics, in Points of View. These were recorded at the CropLife International Conference held in the lead up to the Summit. The plant science industry argued successfully at the Summit that the private sector plays an essential role in sustainable food production but in Food for All , reviewed in In Print, the author argues that the key to sustainability lies in small scale, low input agriculture. What is clear is that farmers trying to raise their production in difficult agronomic conditions, including increasing water scarcity, will have a continuing need for the inputs of agricultural research, a point made clear in this edition's Focus On Dryland agriculture. The Johannesburg Summit has highlighted not only the inequalities that the world contains but also many conflicting views on how to overcome them. At New Agriculturist, we try to present a balanced view, respecting readers' own abilities to judge for themselves. As ever, we welcome your comments. Please let us know if you experience any problems with accessing New Agriculturist. Please also suggest topics that you would like to see covered in future editions and send us your suggestions for making New Agriculturist even easier to use. To access an earlier edition of New Agriculturist visit the back issue page. Here we provide access to all articles in previous editions of New Agriculturist. The latest information on courses and conferences is contained in the current edition only. Alternatively if you are looking for an article on a specific subject, you can also search the site. To suggest a subject for a future edition of the New Agriculturist, or to offer material to us, please use our suggestions page. Interacting with New Agriculturist You are free to print copies of the articles contained within the New Agriculturist and distribute them to those who do not have internet access. Articles may also be used in other publications on the condition that New Agriculturist is credited as the source of the material, and a sample is sent to WRENmedia. For all other uses please ask permission of the authors. Photographs are from the photo library of WRENmedia unless otherwise stated and may only be duplicated with express permission. Please contact Susanna Thorp for further information. Organizations and companies wishing to display services in New Agriculturist and to be linked with this site should contact Patrick Harvey. For information on WRENmedia services, simply click on the logo below. Editorial team: Webmaster: The authors of the New Agriculturist do not guarantee the accuracy of the information contained in the New Agriculturist, nor do they accept responsibility for errors or omissions or their consequences. The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of WRENmedia. |
||||
|
|||||