           

Many of the books reviewed here can now be purchased over the internet from
amazon.co.uk.
You can use the link following most of the reviews, or if you are unable to find the book you are after, you can use the search
facility at the end of the page. |
|
In print
Science, Agriculture and Research: A compromised
participation?
By William Buhler, Stephen Morse, Eddie Arthur, Susannah Bolton and Judy Mann
Published by Earthscan,
120 Pentonville Road, London, N1 9JN, UK
Email: earthinfo@earthscan.co.uk
Website: www.earthscan.co.uk
2002, 174pp, ISBN 1 85383 691 5 (Pb), £17.95
'Science, Agriculture and Research' is essentially a collection of mini-histories covering the early and recent development of agricultural
research in the UK, the changing nature of agricultural research in a developing country, Nigeria, and the origins and elaboration of participatory
appraisal methods in rural development since the 1970s. These histories are used to explore the forces that have directed agricultural research, and
to show how farmers have often been largely divorced from the research process. The authors, a group of research scientists, are keen to give their
perspective on the pressures that direct and constrain the work they do, in the context of the polarised 'debate' that currently rages between
agribusiness and those who oppose its high-tech, intensive blueprint for the future of agriculture.
The authors set out their stall with a strong introduction but then risk losing their audience completely in chapter one: their intention is to
show the complexity of issues that lie behind research agendas. The result is an off-putting series of unanswered questions that do more than enough
to convince the reader that the subject is a complex one. Thankfully the subsequent chapters, are much more straight-forward and reader-friendly, and
if at times the writing becomes somewhat opaque, several 'summaries of the story so far' are provided to keep the reader focussed.
The account of early developments in the UK starts with Jethro Tull and the time when land-owners were the driving forces behind farming
improvements. The story is brought right up to date, to the current situation when the producers of food are much less powerful than the retailers of
food, and agribusiness has replaced agriculture. No wonder that as a result, the needs of farmers, such as maintaining the long-term health of their
land, have been sacrificed to 'the profit-god'.
The path of agricultural research in Nigeria is used to illustrate the experience of many developing countries. Initially research work was
directed entirely at cash crop production, and thereby almost entirely divorced from the needs of subsistence farmers. Even when, after Independence,
the scientists began to pay more attention to food crops, their approach continued to be the one that had always been adopted for cash crops -
intensive monoculture, focussing on single crops, rather than the intercropping that characterised African farming systems. Not surprisingly their
outputs seemed largely irrelevant to African farmers, and the African 'Green Revolution' failed. From this disappointment were born the participatory
methods that were supposed to tell the scientists what African farmers really wanted.
As the title suggests, while participatory methods have been widely adopted as a tool for writing development plans, the authors believe the
participatory movement may be losing its momentum. There are growing doubts about the approach: simply helping people to identify their livelihood
constraints, for example, does not necessarily give them greater opportunities for overcoming them. Poor people may come to resent spending time on
participatory activities which do nothing to change the inequalities of power that keep them in poverty. And what influence do their views have on
donors and aid agencies? They will, it is argued, be swept into the maelstrom of different influences and agendas that guide donors and their funding
decisions, and their priorities will inevitably be compromised. Participation has its limitations.
Back to top
Trees on the Farm: Assessing the
adoption potential of agroforestry practices in Africa
Edited by S. Franzel and S.J. Scherr
Published by CABI Publishing,
Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 8DE, UK
Email: cabi@cabi.org
Website: www.cabi-publishing.org
2002, 207pp, ISBN 0 85199 561 6 (Hb), £35/US$60
Agroforestry technologies can offer a wide range of benefits, improving soils and crop yields, and often providing other resources like fuelwood
or livestock fodder. Despite this, adoption of the new techniques is complex. Unlike some agricultural technologies, such as a new seed variety, the
benefits of agroforestry can take several years to be realised. They can also demand significant changes in farming practices and new labour inputs,
and produce benefits that may be difficult to evaluate in economic terms. This study is based on five agroforestry projects in Zambia and Kenya,
analysing the extent of their adoption, and the reasons for it, focussing on their feasibility for farmers, their profitability and their
acceptability. Thus the assessment is social and economic, as well as technical. The concluding lessons which are drawn out of this process will be
relevant to researchers, in highlighting which approaches merit further attention, to funders and policy-makers, in terms of how limited financial or
institutional resources can be best targeted, and ultimately to farmers themselves.
Back to top
|