             |
Perspective
Rice Genome and Beyond
At the beginning of April many of the secrets at the heart of one of the world's most important cereal crops were revealed. The Swiss company, Syngenta, and the Beijing Genomics Institute in China both published their draft versions of the rice genome in the scientific press. By the end of the year, a fuller and virtually complete version will be published by a publicly-funded consortium supported by many governments. Why is this event of such significance? From my perspective, as a scientist at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), the publication of the rice genome raises several points of significance, not least for plant breeding, for issues of ownership and for agricultural science in general.
Foremost is the opportunity that genetics or, more properly genomics, brings
to plant breeding. An analogy that I like to use is that unravelling the genetic
code is equivalent to producing a dictionary of words minus their definition.
Of course knowing what the words are is important but what use are they without
their meaning? Genomics is the understanding of the function of the genes
- the meaning of the words and their significance. The publication of the
genome sequence is, therefore, just the beginning of much exciting work ahead
to understand the function of each of these genes, and how they work together
to give a better adapted plant. With greater understanding will come greater
efficiency and quicker success in plant breeding.
But who will own this understanding? Popular belief has chosen to fear that
it will be locked away within the laboratories of trans national companies
to be used exclusively for profit, and with consequences that are detrimental
to farmers in developing countries who will be unable to compete. Although
there is ground for such concerns, it is not an inevitable consequence of
private investment in agriculture. My own view is that this can be avoided
provided that there is adequate support to sustain a healthy and competitive
public research system. The availability of the Syngenta sequence for academic
use illustrates the point: public investment must be well and strong to leverage
private sector contribution and to ensure that the knowledge and tools are
accessible for applications that will benefit the poor. There is huge scope
for publicly funded institutions to work on the challenges in plant breeding
that commercial companies would find less financially rewarding. Issues such
as drought or salt tolerance, and enhancing grain nutrition come to mind.
At IRRI, we welcome the availability of the rice genome and look forward to
contributing to the scientific advances it will bring to the poor rice farmers
whom we are committed to serve. Furthermore, public and private institutions
need each other. Remember that the genetic resources, upon which all plant
breeding ultimately depends, lie within publicly-funded institutions within
the developing countries. We must strive to achieve a collaborative environment
in which we can apply scientific innovations from both public and private
sectors to serve the poor. Whether we are from a private or a public institution,
we shall only win if we share.
And what a wonderful opportunity the science of genomics brings to agriculture.
I remember, as a teenager growing up in Hong Kong, how all my friends wanted
to become medical doctors or engineers. They assumed my interest in agriculture
was because I wanted to be a farmer, an unlikely career for a city dweller.
You can understand why today's children, growing up in an urban setting, have
little appreciation of agriculture. But I believe that the public's interest,
created by such events as the publication of the rice genome and the vitamin
A-rich "golden" rice, will help to make agricultural science more attractive
to young students and scientists. If we can attract the best minds, that,
by itself, would go a long way in helping to improve food production.
Back to top
|