New Agriculturist
This monthPoints of viewPerspectiveFocus on . . .In printNews briefIn conferenceDevelopmentsCountry profileDownload sectionsSearch the New AgriculturistBack issues
Points of view is also available with RealAudio

Points of View
Poverty

In the last twelve months, poverty reduction has sparked violent controversy of a scale rarely seen before. Globalization has brought a new urgency to the issue; there is concern that while it could open up new markets and opportunities to many, it might just concentrate wealth in the hands of the few. Environmental changes are concentrating minds, for poverty and environmental degradation seem to be closely linked. But who do we listen to when trying to understand poverty? To the voices of the poor themselves, through the participatory methods which can leave us floundering in the complexity of the issues? Or do we support the '$1 a day' approach to defining poverty, as a sharper stimulus to action? And at the end of the day, who is going to make the difference in poverty reduction; local people with local initiatives, large NGO's like Oxfam, or global bodies like the World Trade Organisation? Here are a series of points of view on poverty: what it is, and what should be done about it.


Poverty has many dimensions. The poor themselves report distress that stems from low consumption, ill-health, lack of schooling, vulnerability, lack of assets, low self-esteem, and disrespect from officials. People who suffer from any one of these conditions tend to suffer from the others as well. These conditions often reinforce each other.
Poverty is concentrated in low-income countries, but can persist in middle-income countries that are very unequal, notably in Southern Africa and much of South America. Poverty can exist in countries where income levels are generally high, infrastructure and technology are well-developed, and urbanization is advanced - for example, Latin America, the USA and South Africa.
Rural Poverty Report 2001, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)

Back to top

In rural Accompong in Jamaica the lives of all citizens are impacted by this peace within the neighbourhood. Despite hard times and obvious poverty among most of the households, an open welcome and hospitality to visitors and strangers to the community gives a distinct feeling of well-being and a good quality of life.
Jamaican research team, Voices of the Poor: Crying out for change

Back to top

We will always need agriculture. People have got to be fed. But what we need is not people living in subsistence agriculture on tiny incomes. We need to have more agricultural processing so that people who work in agriculture can get better wages, and their children can get better educated and so on. But what I absolutely believe is that Globalization, the speed with which knowledge, information, capital, and technology can move around the world, this can be shared in a way that could give us the biggest reduction in poverty, for the largest number of people, that humanity has ever seen.
Clare Short, Secretary of State for International Development, UK Government

Back to top

The pavement dwellers, the poorest of the poor, are the most recent migrants from India's rural areas to cities such as Bombay. Typically, they have been pushed off their plots because of environmental degradation; drought makes it impossible for them to eke out an existence on their land, or to find work on the holdings of others. Their only alternative to starvation is to trek to the cities, pitch a tent of rags on the most convenient pavement they can find, and then look for ways to earn something to eat. Most of the pavement dwellers live along or near the railway tracks, because from there it is easier to travel in search of work and to sell vegetables and fruit to middle-class commuters on their way home from office jobs.
Threats of overnight eviction triggered off many meetings…When a woman at one meeting said, 'If they break our shelters, we'll have to go back to the village', the others pounced on her. 'Go back to what?' they demanded rhetorically. 'To starve like we did before? We can never go back - no matter what they do to us.'
Darryl D'Monte, Against All Odds: Breaking the poverty trap

Back to top

Much of Oxfam's work is about making livelihoods more secure. The more secure people are, the better able they are to plan for the future by saving and investing. Planning for the future reduces the vulnerability of households which so often pushes people back into the poverty trap.
Reducing vulnerability to poverty…requires expanding the effective freedoms available to poor people. In the urban informal sector, this may require the abolition of petty controls on street trading…and the provision of equitable and efficient public transport. In rural areas, a choice of crop varieties and access to credit are two strategies that can greatly enhance the quality of life.
Patrick Watt, Social Investment and Economic Growth: A strategy to eradicate poverty

Back to top

I think policy makers certainly have to be convinced of the importance of poverty reduction and poverty elimination, and that it is, in the final analysis, policies that impinge on poor people as much, if not more than technologies. Within the context of appropriate policies, the sustainable livelihoods approach is, in my opinion, a powerful tool for helping to implement those policies in a way which will ensure poverty is reduced.
Mike Scott of the Department for International Development, UK

Back to top

People tended to equate poverty with powerlessness and impotence, and to relate well-being to security and a sense of control of their lives. A woman from the community of Borborema established a connection between power and control, and well-being. She argued, 'The rich one is someone who says, 'I am going to do it,' and does it.' The poor, in contrast, do not fulfill their wishes or develop their capacities'.
Brazilian research team, Voices of the Poor: Crying out for change

Back to top

A key function of governments is the provision of law and order, and this is also a priority for the poor. One of the findings of the World Bank's Voices of the Poor report was that poor people attach enormous importance to security - security from violence and security for their property. Without this they find it impossible to improve their lives. The poor worldwide also tend to be very distrustful of existing police and criminal justice systems. Far from protecting people from violence, too often elements within the police and justice systems are themselves sources of violence and abuse.
UK Department for International Development, Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor, White Paper on International Development

Back to top

Effective poverty reduction requires resources to be allocated to the rural and the poor. But far from implying a neglect of economic growth, this can speed it. It is inefficient, as well as inequitable, to exclude people from schooling or managing productive assets because they are too poor to borrow; or because they are born in villages and hence lack urban facilities; or because they live in remote areas with limited access to markets. Still, reviving agriculture is not the whole, but only part of the answer to end rural poverty. Agricultural change can work to reduce poverty, but only when linked to social changes that give the poor power over the social factors that shape, and far too often circumscribe, the horizons of their possibilities, including their agricultural options and assets.
Rural Poverty Report 2001, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)

Back to top

Labour intensive approaches are especially appropriate to rural poverty reduction. Labour intensive development economises on capital and land. Capital is always scarce in low-income countries, and land is scarce in more and more of them. Developing countries, with high ratios of labour to capital, also gain more from market liberalization if they encourage labour-intensive production. Employment-intensive policies, technologies and institutions usually help both economic growth and poverty reduction, since the poor can usually offer only their labour. Thus, subsidies to labour-replacing capital, like tractors, can harm the poor. Smaller farms tend to use more labour and less equipment than larger ones.
Rural Poverty Report 2001, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)

Back to top

What we are basically saying is that we should not focus our investment and our attention only on population control. Because even if we control the population and there is no significant increase in production, you will still have a lot of people living in poverty. So we really need to look at mechanisms by which we can begin to put those technologies which have higher productivity onto African farmers fields and those are the issues to which governments should give priority.
Dr Michael Foster, of Sasakawa Global 2000, Uganda

Back to top

Long considered distinct issues…ecological and social problems are in fact tightly interconnected and mutually reinforcing. The burden of dirty air and water and of decimated natural resources invariably falls on the disadvantaged, and the poor, in turn, are often compelled to tear down the last nearby tree or pollute the local stream in order to survive. Solving one problem without addressing the other is simply not feasible. In fact, poverty and environmental decline are both embedded deeply in today's economic systems. What is needed is…a synthesis of ecology, sociology and economics that can be used as the basis for creating an economy that is both socially and ecologically sustainable - the central challenge facing humanity as the new millennium begins.
The Worldwatch Institute, State of the World 2001

Back to top

We know that cutting down trees will cause water shortages and that making charcoal can cause forest fires, but we have no choice. Because we lack food, we have to exploit the forest.
A resident of Ha Tinh, Vietnam, from Voices of the Poor: Crying out for change

Back to top

Creating livelihood opportunities involves more than employment creation, although this is an important element of poverty eradication strategies. This is because few people, especially among the poor, have a single 'job' on which they are dependent for their survival. Instead, the majority of people, in the urban informal sector and in rural areas, tend to survive by a number of strategies.
Increasingly the word 'livelihood' better captures the 'complex and diverse reality' of poor people's economic activities. Discovering ways of making livelihoods sustainable and more likely to deliver an acceptable standard of living is an urgent priority for governments and organizations committed to poverty eradication.
Patrick Watt, Social Investment and Economic Growth: A strategy to eradicate poverty

Back to top

There is a particular responsibility on developed countries. There is no sense, for example, in using development assistance to support countries and then undermining this through trade restrictions and unfair subsidies. All developed country policies towards the world's poorest countries should be consistent with a commitment to sustainable development and poverty reduction.
Open trade has a vital role to play in helping countries to reduce poverty. But to maximise these benefits, poor countries need a rules based international trading system, with continuing reductions in barriers to trade in both developed and developing countries. Where there are no rules, the rich and powerful bully the poor and the powerless. In a globalising world, poor countries need effective, open and accountable global institutions where they can pursue their interests on more equal terms.
UK Department for International Development, Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor, White Paper on International Development

Back to top

WRENmedia